In Canada, people might generally cite the Charter of Rights and Freedoms for some issues, but usually refer to the concept of a right and not the actual text of how it appears in our laws. They certainly hardly ever even consider the precise grammar of a clause, the way some people in certain other countries will make the basis of their argument a single comma and the way it breaks up a sentence into its core tenants. Even the best legal scholars in the entire country have no idea about what all the constitution contains because it is simply not exhaustively listed. We know of 30 things that are certainly part of it, by being expressly included, but not much else for certain. We also don't even know for sure at times whether the constitution has been amended, like a couple of years ago when a province simply declared by passing a bill that their legislators don't have to make an oath of allegiance to the king if they don't want to, and nobody has resolved whether this is allowed or not because it claims to amend the constitution but some claim that they can't do that.
Note that I am not thinking about the precise circumstances which brought about a constitution, that might bring about a generally democratic society regardless of what the precise wording of the text of the law is.